How to date Ann Demeulemeester & Dries Van Noten

The tells — 6, sourced

1. 01

   Era boundary first — for BOTH houses the value split is 'the founder at the founder's label' versus after. ANN DEMEULEMEESTER: the personal 'Ann by Ann' era is 1985–SS2014 (she announced her exit by handwritten letter in Nov 2013; FW2014 was a transitional studio-team season). After it: Sébastien Meunier (SS2015–FW2021, her hand-picked successor), then Claudio Antonioli's acquisition (2020) and a ghost-team interregnum, Ludovic de Saint Sernin (FW2023 — ONE collection only), and Stefano Gallici (SS2024–). DRIES VAN NOTEN: 'Dries at Dries' is 1986–June 2024 (his 129th and final show, SS2025 menswear); Julian Klausner from December 2024. Crucially, Puig's 2018 majority stake did NOT change the label or the boundary — only the June 2024 retirement did.

2. 02

   ANN DEMEULEMEESTER — the succession is the crown jewel, not the tag. Match the collection to its era window: 1985–SS14 Ann; SS15–FW21 Meunier; FW23 de Saint Sernin; SS24– Gallici. The market pays a clear premium for personal-era 'Ann by Ann' pieces, so a Meunier- or Gallici-era piece sold as 'archive Ann' is the thing to catch.

3. 03

   ANN DEMEULEMEESTER — the article-number code (collector-sourced, Dusty Archive — single-origin, so corroborate): the care-tag article number encodes the date — the first 2–4 digits the year, the LAST digit the season (1 = spring, 2 = fall), e.g. '081' = Spring 2008; after FW2014 a '0' was added (e.g. '1902' = Fall 2019). Around 2005 the tag stock switched from one-side-sheen cardboard to matte black. The 'blanche line' (WHITE brand tags) is a post-2013 REISSUE programme of archival pieces — never a personal-era original.

4. 04

   ANN DEMEULEMEESTER — authentication is unusually easy: fakes are rare (a reputable archive dealer puts it at '99% authentic'), and the classic fake tell is a MISSPELLING of her name on the label. Personal-era shoes had the entire label sewn into the sole (later switched to a heat stamp). 90s pieces were made exclusively in Belgium; from ~2000 some production moved to France / Italy / Tunisia / Portugal.

5. 05

   DRIES VAN NOTEN — the label is less systematised (no formal decoder), so the era boundary IS the dating tool: before June 2024 = Dries, after = Klausner. The collector-circulated article-number reading (Instagram, single-source — treat as lore): the first 3 digits date it — the first two the year, the third the season (1 = SS, 2 = FW), e.g. '0812' = FW2008. Confirm against the garment's obvious era; the print and fabric usually date a Dries piece faster than the tag.

6. 06

   The market, honestly: neither is a hype/scarcity play — Dries especially 'was never an insanely good resale brand,' and there is a lot on the resale sites. What moves is the FOUNDER premium: the March 2024 retirement announcement spiked Dries searches ~200% on The RealReal ('Dries-mania'), and Ann collectors 'doubled down on Ann by Ann' after 2013. What NOT to overpay for: a successor-era piece sold as the founder's; an Ann 'blanche' reissue sold as personal-era archive; a print-anonymous Dries piece dated only by a contested tag code.

Two sources or it ships as rumor. Where a tell is collector-lore rather than a museum fact, the tell says so — weight it with construction and provenance, never alone.

The full dossiers